Skip to main content
search

April 4, 2025

Navigating the challenges in antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) development requires overcoming complex hurdles in through the entire development process. ADCs combine the affinity-based antigen targeting of monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic small molecules. This combination of technologies promises tissue-specific targeting with lower toxicity, and using mechanistic modeling techniques can help the development of ADCs. Every year more ADCs are approved and enter development. The complexity of ADCs presents many development challenges. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling can improve the efficiency of developing ADCs. QSP models combine systems biology and pharmacology and models are built on the principle that the effect of a therapeutic may not be the result of one specific interaction, but rather a network of interactions. 

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and the Current Landscape

Antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs, are monoclonal antibodies that are linked to another drug (“payload”) via a molecular linker. This technology allows selective delivery of the payload, often a cytotoxic drug, to the target cell via receptor internalization.

While still a relatively new modality, ADCs are rapidly gaining popularity. Mylotarg was the first ADC that was approved in 2000 for the treatment of leukemia. By 2024, over 370 ADCs have entered the clinic (Colombo et al. 2024), and 15 have been approved in the US.

Most ADCs treat cancer. However, scientists are also developing novel small molecule payloads for other indications, including autoinflammatory diseases. There have also been advancements in ADC technologies in preclinical development, with bispecific ADCs, dual payload ADCs, degrader payloads, etc. (Beacon Intelligence, 2024)

Scientists used to think of ADCs as “site-directed missiles” directing their cytotoxic payload to the target cells. Yet, clinical experience has shown that ADCs behave more like “tethered mines.” Conjugation to an antibody decreases the systemic distribution of the cytotoxic payload. But it doesn’t eliminate exposure to other tissues. Therefore, maximizing the therapeutic index is still a concern during the design and dose optimization of ADCs.

Figure 1 Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) created in Biorender

Figure 1 Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) created in Biorender

Breakdown of ADCs entering clinical trials from 2012-2022
Breakdown of ADC Clinical Trials initiated by phase from 2012-2022

Challenges of Designing Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Successful development of ADCs starts at the design stage, continuing through clinical trial design and patient selection. Design of ADCs is especially challenging due to the many components requiring optimization, including the antibody, linker, and payload. Optimal drug properties often depend on physiological and target-specific biological parameters as well. The following table outlines the system- and/or drug-dependent or independent parameters to optimize.

Key Data

Drug Independent

Drug Dependent

System Dependent

Cellular Measures
e.g. receptor expression, internalization rate, tumor growth rates

Data for model calibration/validation
e.g. in vitro cellular disposition, PK, TGI, TCP, outcome

System Independent

Physiological Parameters
e.g. compartment volumes, BWs

Drug Properties
e.g. DAR, drug affinity,
payload efflux

As an ADC progresses through development, understanding how its drug properties and dosing regimens impact efficacy and toxicity becomes critical to program success.

Quantitative systems pharmacology modeling can inform the entire development cycle for an ADC. Modeling can address different stages of development for ADCs and Certara has two modeling solutions that answer development questions at R&D, preclinical, and clinical stages.

R&D

Preclinical

Clinical

Efficacy

  • Which format combination will result in highest intracellular concentrations (e.g. linker and payload)?
  • What receptor target should we use?
  • What Kd would maximize efficacy?
  • What first-in-patient or efficacious dose can we expect? Does our ADC have a bystander effect in vivo?
  • How does our ADC compare to an approved ADC?
  • Could an approved ADC be used to target a different indication?
  • What is the efficacious dose for a different population of individuals?
  • How will PFS change in a different subpopulation?

Toxicity

  • At what receptor expression levels on healthy tissues can we expect antibody-driven toxicity?
  • If data is available for payload distribution: can we expect payload- driven toxicity with a certain DAR and deconjugation rate?
  • Can we avoid toxicity observed in a comparator molecule? What DAR is suitable to maximize therapeutic window?
  • Could an alternate dosing schedule reduce toxicity incidence? What will the rate of AEs (adverse effects) be in a different population?

Preclinical and Clinical Stage: A Validated Platform Model for ADCs

A platform model containing relevant mechanisms can translate preclinical findings to the clinic.

To assist ADC development at the preclinical and clinical stages, we developed a validated platform QSP model of ADCs. The model describes mechanisms generalizable to ADCs as a class. We validated the model against two clinically approved ADCs (trastuzumab-DM1 and trastuzumab-DXd). Our QSP experts developed the model using preclinical data for the two drugs as well as literature data for target-specific and physiological parameters.

The model captured both the preclinical activity of the drugs and predicted clinical efficacy. Learn more about how we developed this model:

R&D Stage: Early Feasibility Analysis of ADCs

Using the platform model, we recently developed a set of 42 models for early feasibility analysis for ADCs. The models cover common ADC formats such as:

  • monospecific,
  • membrane receptor targeting drugs
  • novel formats such as bispecific ADCs simultaneously targeting a membrane receptor and a soluble ligand.

These models can support design decisions. They can also help answer questions about how ADC properties (target, affinity, linker stability, payload potency) may impact dose-response. In conjunction with in vitro data, these models can provide an early understanding of how in vitro potency may translate to dose-response in humans.

The Future of ADC Development

The development of ADCs is no longer solely about more potent payloads or more stable linkers. The future lies in alignment—bringing together advanced drug design, patient-focused approaches, and cutting-edge technologies like QSP modeling.

With AI and machine learning set to augment modeling capabilities, the possibilities for precision drug development will only expand further. This will empower developers to design smarter ADCs, enter trials with greater confidence, and ultimately deliver life-changing therapies to patients faster than ever before. Adopting mechanistic modeling approaches early in the process will accelerate development and help navigate the complexities associated with ADC development.

Learn more about our QSP Model Pack for Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC)

Includes 42 models for monospecific and bispecific ADCs

Features avidity effects and multi-compartment pharmacokinetics

Supports in vitro and in vivo simulations

Learn moreDownload the model pack

Download the ADC model pack

Discover how Certara’s Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Model Pack in AssessTM can transform your ADC research.

Gain insights into ADC pharmacology with 42 detailed models
Visualize mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics
Customize parameters to fit your research needs